Does God Almighty have two sons Lucifer is the first born and is the Prince of Darkness and God the father who is second born and represents the light?
The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the light of the world, and Lucifer (or Satan) is a fallen angel who became the Prince of Darkness through his rebellion. There is no biblical support for the idea that Lucifer and God the Father are both sons of God, with Lucifer being the firstborn. This idea conflicts with the clear teachings of Scripture that affirm Jesus alone as the Son of God.
Lucifer's origin: Lucifer was originally a high-ranking angel created by God, but he fell from grace due to pride and rebellion. The Bible makes no mention of Lucifer being a "son" of God in the sense of divine sonship.
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) - "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
Ezekiel 28:15 (KJV) - "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."
Lucifer was a created being, not a son of God in the sense of the relationship between God and Christ. His title "son of the morning" refers more to his brilliance and beauty as a created being before his fall, not to any sonship status like Jesus Christ.
The true Son of God (Jesus Christ): The Bible is clear that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God, not Lucifer. Christ is the eternal Word who became flesh and represents the light.
John 1:14 (KJV) - "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the ONLY begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."
John 8:12 (KJV) - "Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."
Lucifer's rebellion: Lucifer's role as the "Prince of Darkness" is a result of his rebellion against God. He is the leader of the forces of evil, not a divine son, and his nature stands in stark contrast to Christ, the true Son of God, who represents light.
Why not Isaiah 14-12 is the only time the name Lucifer is mentioned in the Bible and it said; (Lucifer son of morning)if words in Genesis have spiritual meaning then that would make Lucifer the first born from God Almighty? So Lucifer rebelled against his brother the Prince of Light God the Father cuz Lucifer would fear God Almighty. Every living thing on earth follows the samething mom dad sons daughters even bugs do that so Lucifer is no different. To be a prince or a son you would need to have a king or a father.
Hi Keygbo. If I might add a little to this: we need to understand this passage in Isaiah chap 14. This message given by God to Isaiah was a proverb (or, parable; or even as some have translated, " a taunting speech") against the King of Babylon (namely, King Nebuchadnezzar). We see this from Isaiah 14:4 (a proverb against the king of Babylon) and this proverb ends at Isaiah 14:27.
The name Lucifer & son of the morning, were words used to describe this king (the 'shining one', the 'son of the dawn' - symbols of Babylonian supreme power that prevailed in that part of the world). He positioned himself as a god and believed himself to be so mighty & invincible, that God records the very sentiments of this king's heart: He said, "I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." ( Isaiah 14:13,14).
And this account of this king has often, even rightly been attributed to Satan, whose spirit was in control of the king; a spirit of having godlikeness, supreme power & authority, & invincibility. We see also Ezekiel 28:12-19, reference to the King of Tyre, yet the description supplied fits more with Satan, and thus a lamentation against him, who was the spirit at work in the king. So, the name Lucifer (shining one) or 'son of the morning', whether applied to a king or Satan himself has nothing to do with being "the first born of God", rather of the evil spirit manifesting in Satan's servants who stand against the Almighty. And the next time we read of such a stand & declaration against the Living God will be in the anti-Christ (called here "the son of perdition", 2 Thessalonians 2:3,4), though many of the Roman emperors of old also claimed deity.
The Bible does not explicitly state that Satan's name is Lucifer. Abram has a name change to Abraham. To be the prince you must have a king. Son only has one definition male descendant.
Yes Keygbo, biologically speaking, the word "Son only has one definition (a) male descendant". But 'son' doesn't always refer to biological descendency. Take for examples: Genesis 6:2, Job 1:6, Romans 8:14, "sons of God". In just these three examples, these "sons" have no biological connection to God. The first to either angels or the descendants of Seth; the second to angels/heavenly beings; and the third to those who are born again, led of God's Spirit & adopted into God's family. All these are God's sons, or sons of God.
And then we can take the idioms, "son of the road, or son of the soil". I'm sure you've heard of these not oft used expressions. Most would believe that if those phrases were used for a particular person, then it is understood that neither the road nor the soil gave birth to sons. Likewise, Revelation 1:5 speaks of Jesus being "the prince of the kings of the earth". I suspect that you wouldn't now believe that Jesus, as a prince, had his descendency in an earthly king (or, multiple kings). So yes, biologically, the son of an earthly king would be called a prince, but metaphorically, this is not so as there is no descendency to a human king - just a title.
Lucifer, or 'shining one' was given to the king of Babylon who lived & ruled by that satanic spirit. Sure, Satan was never called Lucifer, but he, as did the king, were described with the same phrase: "the shining one, son of the morning". So whether Satan is referred to as "the prince of the power of the air" ( Ephesians 2:2) or the "prince of darkness" (taken loosely from Ephesians 6:12), these both describe the same devil, one who has power over his demons that move about freely in the world and in the air, as well as to the devil & his demons who brings darkness to people's minds & spirits, keeping them in captivity to sin, yet making them believe that they are in light, joy & hope ( 2 Corinthians 11:14). And he is called a prince, meaning that he is the ruler, yet having no king above him.
Wow Chris you sure do know your stuff thank you for helping me understand. I hope you can help me with one more thing. Why does it say let's make humans in (our) image? Is that because of the Holy Ghost and Jesus are there?
Thank you for reading our responses to you Keygbo and please remember we can only offer comment to what the Scriptures say & how we understand them. So even with Genesis 1:26,27, there will be different opinions based on our reading & understanding.
We note that in these verses, God speaks of "our likeness" and then in v27, "his own image". And we remember the Apostle John in John chap 1, wrote of God's Word being a vital aspect of His Character & that He gave flesh & mortality to His Word, being Jesus, His Christ given as our Sacrifice.
When I read these verses together (and others), I understand that in these Genesis references, God is speaking of His whole Being involved in His creative Work of both humans & everything else in this world & the universe. What I mean is that God, the One & only God, involved Himself completely in creation; He spoke things into existence (His Word - that Word which would one day millennia ahead become Jesus), and God's Spirit sent forth to perform those works (whether in creation or placing that Holy Seed in Mary, or even changing lives of those who would believe).
So, I do see in Genesis 1:26,27, that the Triune God (the Father God, His Word & His Spirit - all One) is revealed to us, and mankind was blessed with His Image: His Word & Spirit also working constantly in them. But man's fall into disobedience & sin changed all that and we needed a Savior to redeem us & God's Spirit to renew us & help us live holy & acceptable lives in a sinful & corrupt world. Such is the Mercy and Love of God for us. GBU.
The Bible teaches that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the light of the world, and Lucifer (or Satan) is a fallen angel who became the Prince of Darkness through his rebellion. There is no biblical support for the idea that Lucifer and God the Father are both sons of God, with Lucifer being the firstborn. This idea conflicts with the clear teachings of Scripture that affirm Jesus alone as the Son of God.
Lucifer's origin: Lucifer was originally a high-ranking angel created by God, but he fell from grace due to pride and rebellion. The Bible makes no mention of Lucifer being a "son" of God in the sense of divine sonship.
Isaiah 14:12 (KJV) - "How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations!"
Ezekiel 28:15 (KJV) - "Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee."
Lucifer was a created being, not a son of God in the sense of the relationship between God and Christ. His title "son of the morning" refers more to his brilliance and beauty as a created being before his fall, not to any sonship status like Jesus Christ.
The true Son of God (Jesus Christ): The Bible is clear that Jesus Christ is the only begotten Son of God, not Lucifer. Christ is the eternal Word who became flesh and represents the light.
John 1:14 (KJV) - "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the ONLY begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth."
John 8:12 (KJV) - "Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life."
Lucifer's rebellion: Lucifer's role as the "Prince of Darkness" is a result of his rebellion against God. He is the leader of the forces of evil, not a divine son, and his nature stands in stark contrast to Christ, the true Son of God, who represents light.
2 Corinthians 11:14
No, these are not true facts concerning the God of Scripture.
The name Lucifer & son of the morning, were words used to describe this king (the 'shining one', the 'son of the dawn' - symbols of Babylonian supreme power that prevailed in that part of the world). He positioned himself as a god and believed himself to be so mighty & invincible, that God records the very sentiments of this king's heart: He said, "I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." ( Isaiah 14:13,14).
And this account of this king has often, even rightly been attributed to Satan, whose spirit was in control of the king; a spirit of having godlikeness, supreme power & authority, & invincibility. We see also Ezekiel 28:12-19, reference to the King of Tyre, yet the description supplied fits more with Satan, and thus a lamentation against him, who was the spirit at work in the king. So, the name Lucifer (shining one) or 'son of the morning', whether applied to a king or Satan himself has nothing to do with being "the first born of God", rather of the evil spirit manifesting in Satan's servants who stand against the Almighty. And the next time we read of such a stand & declaration against the Living God will be in the anti-Christ (called here "the son of perdition", 2 Thessalonians 2:3,4), though many of the Roman emperors of old also claimed deity.
And then we can take the idioms, "son of the road, or son of the soil". I'm sure you've heard of these not oft used expressions. Most would believe that if those phrases were used for a particular person, then it is understood that neither the road nor the soil gave birth to sons. Likewise, Revelation 1:5 speaks of Jesus being "the prince of the kings of the earth". I suspect that you wouldn't now believe that Jesus, as a prince, had his descendency in an earthly king (or, multiple kings). So yes, biologically, the son of an earthly king would be called a prince, but metaphorically, this is not so as there is no descendency to a human king - just a title.
Lucifer, or 'shining one' was given to the king of Babylon who lived & ruled by that satanic spirit. Sure, Satan was never called Lucifer, but he, as did the king, were described with the same phrase: "the shining one, son of the morning". So whether Satan is referred to as "the prince of the power of the air" ( Ephesians 2:2) or the "prince of darkness" (taken loosely from Ephesians 6:12), these both describe the same devil, one who has power over his demons that move about freely in the world and in the air, as well as to the devil & his demons who brings darkness to people's minds & spirits, keeping them in captivity to sin, yet making them believe that they are in light, joy & hope ( 2 Corinthians 11:14). And he is called a prince, meaning that he is the ruler, yet having no king above him.
We note that in these verses, God speaks of "our likeness" and then in v27, "his own image". And we remember the Apostle John in John chap 1, wrote of God's Word being a vital aspect of His Character & that He gave flesh & mortality to His Word, being Jesus, His Christ given as our Sacrifice.
When I read these verses together (and others), I understand that in these Genesis references, God is speaking of His whole Being involved in His creative Work of both humans & everything else in this world & the universe. What I mean is that God, the One & only God, involved Himself completely in creation; He spoke things into existence (His Word - that Word which would one day millennia ahead become Jesus), and God's Spirit sent forth to perform those works (whether in creation or placing that Holy Seed in Mary, or even changing lives of those who would believe).
So, I do see in Genesis 1:26,27, that the Triune God (the Father God, His Word & His Spirit - all One) is revealed to us, and mankind was blessed with His Image: His Word & Spirit also working constantly in them. But man's fall into disobedience & sin changed all that and we needed a Savior to redeem us & God's Spirit to renew us & help us live holy & acceptable lives in a sinful & corrupt world. Such is the Mercy and Love of God for us. GBU.
This comment thread is locked. Please enter a new comment below to start a new comment thread.
Note: Comment threads older than 2 months are automatically locked.
Do you have a Bible comment or question?
Posting comments is currently unavailable due to high demand on the server.
Please check back in an hour or more. Thank you for your patience!
Report Comment
Which best represents the problem with the comment?